Overleg gebruker:Marrens
Voeg kopje toeLaatste reactie: 23 dagen geleden door Marrens in het onderwerp Re
Dildo (voorwerp)
[brontekst bewerken]Hi, please stop blanking pages or I need to report you for vandalism. Icodense (overleg) 22 dec 2025 11:47 (UTC)
I have undone your recent edits from the past day, as they were clearly unconstructive, and you did not respond to messages on your talk page. Please note that Wikipedia is not censored and can include topics that you may personally find objectionable. DreamRimmer (overleg) 22 dec 2025 16:23 (UTC)
- There were a few small articles I considered inappropriate and tried to remove them (one wasn't written in Zealandic but in Dutch).
- The other changes and articles I made and you removed are very suitable, such as an article about Newcastle upon Tyne, adding info about states of Australia, a category about animals in Australia ('Beêst in Australië '), and news info in 2025. Marrens (overleg) 22 dec 2025 16:47 (UTC)
- Can you please explain zea:Special:Diff/170411, zea:Special:Diff/170413, zea:Special:Diff/170407, zea:Special:Diff/170394, zea:Special:Diff/170392, and zea:Special:Diff/170390? DreamRimmer (overleg) 22 dec 2025 16:50 (UTC)
- Your earlier contributions were generally constructive, so I limited my actions to reverting the recent edits. I have undeleted four pages that were deleted while clearing up those edits. DreamRimmer (overleg) 22 dec 2025 16:55 (UTC)
- Like I said I considered these articles inappropriate for the Zealandic Wikipedia, because why should a small Wikipedia like the Zealandic Wikipedia containing such questionable articles, so I tried to remove them.
- By the way, I saw you reverting some changes I made but many other suitable changes you removed weren't reverted. Marrens (overleg) 22 dec 2025 17:08 (UTC)
- I do not have the authority to decide what content is appropriate for this project, but I would reiterate that Wikipedia is not censored and may include topics you personally find objectionable. The block was not based on content, but on the diffs mentioned above, which appear to be vandalism, and your response has not changed my view. If you believe the block is incorrect, you may seek a second opinion and request an unblock at m:SRM. Regarding the deletion of those good pages, it was a mistake on my part, and I have restored them and will be more cautious in the future. DreamRimmer (overleg) 22 dec 2025 17:23 (UTC)
- The changes because of which I am blocked aren't vandalistic, vandalism is when someone has the bad intention to demolish things, I explained to you why I tried to remove them, I hadn't any bad intentions at all but was just keeping a small Wikipedia like the Zealandic one decent and unquestionable. Marrens (overleg) 22 dec 2025 17:35 (UTC)
- Like I said before you only restored a few changes I made. Marrens (overleg) 22 dec 2025 18:02 (UTC)
- I do not have the authority to decide what content is appropriate for this project, but I would reiterate that Wikipedia is not censored and may include topics you personally find objectionable. The block was not based on content, but on the diffs mentioned above, which appear to be vandalism, and your response has not changed my view. If you believe the block is incorrect, you may seek a second opinion and request an unblock at m:SRM. Regarding the deletion of those good pages, it was a mistake on my part, and I have restored them and will be more cautious in the future. DreamRimmer (overleg) 22 dec 2025 17:23 (UTC)